It’s been roughly a year since the Facebook Oversight Board opened its doors for business—and while you may mostly remember the board from its decision on Donald Trump’s suspension from Facebook, but there’s been a lot going on since then. So we thought it was a good time to check in on how this experiment in platform governance is faring. In October, the Board released its lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/m1/v/t0.41931-6/An_SieDzRxmkwChl2RsnXhvhnTW0JDTT6FvN4oTC3_jNiSjlSxLA5qG053VPQ_n79Bu5sOzX7hzVI0ROPFWlMX1OjtlK8EGtX5cdDZjtYxK1-R_BJ0WLx8lzsZ3rPVKsr16YrH-eb41gChD7lWQauLjr2g?ccb=10-5&oh=ba3f9388ca3e7ce086babb05b1a2b143&oe=6196E46F&_nc_sid=340960">first transparency report, and Facebook—now Meta—has published Q2-and-Q3-2021-Quarterly-Update-on-the-Oversight-Board.pdf">its own update on how it’s been responding to the Board’s decisions and recommendations. Meanwhile, Lawfare is keeping track of developments on our Facebook Oversight Board Blog, run by the inimitable Tia Sewell. 

On this episode of Arbiters of Truth, our series on the online information ecosystem, Evelyn Douek and Quinta Jurecic talked about what the data shows about what cases the Board is taking, how the Board’s role seems to be evolving, and, of course, whether we’re going to have to start calling this the Meta Oversight Board, thanks to Facebook’s name change.

Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.