Please login or sign up to post and edit reviews.
Social Media Censorship
Podcast |
Flack Pack
Media Type |
audio
Categories Via RSS |
Business
Careers
Education
Government
Publication Date |
May 17, 2019
Episode Duration |
00:48:08

Free speech is being challenged around the world. A comedian in Brazil gets six months in prison for offending public officials. Global leaders have signed a pact pushing for tighter controls over online content. And the Trump White House has launched a survey asking people whether they’ve been censored on social media.

Some people want more censorship. Others decry the growing trend toward speech limitations. What is the answer? Can we remove bad content without threatening our inherent First Amendment rights? Robert explores this important communication topic with an expert from the Cato Institute.

Also, this week’s Buzzer Beater guest joins the show from his perch on Embassy Row, where the questions take on an international flavor. And Jason reviews a tasty tweet about pancakes that lands it’s sponsor on a hot griddle.

Links:

Right-wing comedian’s prison sentence sparks free-speech debate in Bolsonaro’s Brazil

White House declines to back Christchurch call to stamp out online extremism amid free speech concerns

White House launches tool to report censorship on Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter

Guest: Jordan Humphreys

AP Stylebook

Upload filters and one-hour takedowns

Government aims to make UK safest place in world to be online

European Parliament approves controversial copyright law

Guest: Will Duffield

Why the government should not regulate content moderation of social media

The twenty-six words that created the internet

The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech

IHOP traumatized the internet with its Mother’s Day tweet of a pancake-filled womb

Some people want more censorship. Others decry the growing trend toward speech limitations. What is the answer?

Free speech is being challenged around the world. A comedian in Brazil gets six months in prison for offending public officials. Global leaders have signed a pact pushing for tighter controls over online content. And the Trump White House has launched a survey asking people whether they’ve been censored on social media.

Some people want more censorship. Others decry the growing trend toward speech limitations. What is the answer? Can we remove bad content without threatening our inherent First Amendment rights? Robert explores this important communication topic with an expert from the Cato Institute.

Also, this week’s Buzzer Beater guest joins the show from his perch on Embassy Row, where the questions take on an international flavor. And Jason reviews a tasty tweet about pancakes that lands it’s sponsor on a hot griddle.

Links:

Right-wing comedian’s prison sentence sparks free-speech debate in Bolsonaro’s Brazil

White House declines to back Christchurch call to stamp out online extremism amid free speech concerns

White House launches tool to report censorship on Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter

Guest: Jordan Humphreys

AP Stylebook

Upload filters and one-hour takedowns

Government aims to make UK safest place in world to be online

European Parliament approves controversial copyright law

Guest: Will Duffield

Why the government should not regulate content moderation of social media

The twenty-six words that created the internet

The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech

IHOP traumatized the internet with its Mother’s Day tweet of a pancake-filled womb

This episode currently has no reviews.

Submit Review
This episode could use a review!

This episode could use a review! Have anything to say about it? Share your thoughts using the button below.

Submit Review