Please login or sign up to post and edit reviews.
- Publication Date |
- Jun 28, 2017
- Episode Duration |
- 00:59:43
The Supreme Court’s 2016 term may not have contained the usual number of blockbuster cases, but it did have its fair share of drama. Between the stonewalling of Merrick Garland, the filibustered confirmation of Neil Gorsuch, rumors about Anthony Kennedy’s possible retirement, and in the background, the White House offensive against the federal judiciary, court-watchers had no shortage of things to keep them up at night.
And so this week on Amicus, we pour a couple of our favorite court-watchers a big cup of coffee and plop some microphones down at Slate’s annual “Breakfast Table.” Mark Joseph Stern and Pamela Karlan join us to discuss what we learned about the justices this term and what we can expect from them in the fall.
Transcripts of Amicus are available to Slate Plus members, several days after each episode posts. For a limited time, get 90 days of free access to Slate Plus in the new Slate iOS app. Download it today at
slate.com/app.
Please let us know what you think of Amicus. Join the discussion of this episode on Facebook. Our email is
amicus@slate.com.
Podcast production by Tony Field.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
megaphone.fm/adchoicesThis episode could use a review!
This episode could use a review! Have anything to say about it? Share your thoughts using the button below.
Submit Review