Please login or sign up to post and edit reviews.
- Publication Date |
- Dec 04, 2018
- Episode Duration |
- 00:59:31
A case in which the Court held that a vocational expert’s testimony may constitute “substantial evidence” of “other work” even if the expert does not provide the underlying data on which that testimony is premised.
This episode could use a review!
This episode could use a review! Have anything to say about it? Share your thoughts using the button below.
Submit Review