About Corey Quinn

Over the course of my career, I’ve worn many different hats in the tech world: systems administrator, systems engineer, director of technical operations, and director of DevOps, to name a few. Today, I’m a cloud economist at The Duckbill Group, the author of the weekly Last Week in AWS newsletter, and the host of two podcasts: Screaming in the Cloud and, you guessed it, AWS Morning Brief, which you’re about to listen to.

Links

• Trend Micro Cloud One™
• @QuinnyPig
• ChaosSearch

Transcript

Corey: Welcome to AWS Morning Brief: Whiteboard Confessional. I’m Cloud Economist Corey Quinn. This weekly show exposes the semi-polite lie that is whiteboard architecture diagrams. You see, a child can draw a whiteboard architecture, but the real world is a mess. We discuss the hilariously bad decisions that make it into shipping products, the unfortunate hacks the real-world forces us to build, and that the best to call your staging environment is “theory”. Because invariably whatever you’ve built works in the theory, but not in production. Let’s get to it.

Corey: This episode is brought to you by Trend Micro Cloud One™. A security services platform for organizations building in the Cloud. I know you're thinking that that's a mouthful because it is, but what's easier to say? “I'm glad we have Trend Micro Cloud One™, a security services platform for organizations building in the Cloud,” or, “Hey, bad news. It's going to be a few more weeks. I kind of forgot about that security thing.” I thought so. Trend Micro Cloud One™ is an automated, flexible all-in-one solution that protects your workflows and containers with cloud-native security. Identify and resolve security issues earlier in the pipeline, and access your cloud environments sooner, with full visibility, so you can get back to what you do best, which is generally building great applications. Discover Trend Micro Cloud One™ a security services platform for organizations building in the Cloud. Whew. At trendmicro.com/screaming.

In almost any production environment, there's going to be a few tasks as your company grows that someone winds up having to perform in your production app. And in many cases, the people who have to perform those tasks are themselves not excessively technical, which means if you fail to properly invest in internal tooling, well, that means you're going to have someone who winds up getting this, effectively, printed out page that hangs in their cubicle—or equivalent during these uncertain times—where they wind up following a checklist of, step one: SSH into a production server. Step two: copy and paste the following command, which in turn, I don't know, spins up a Ruby on Rails console, or does some task on the database and returns a query. Now, this is universally recognized as awful because, for better or worse, most business users are not overwhelmingly comfortable when it comes to using SSH on the command line.

Now, in an ideal world with unlimited resources, you would be able to have an internal tools developer who could focus on things like that specifically for your teams. And in fact, most very large hyper-scale companies have entire herds of people doing nothing but that. But when you're building something from scratch, and you're a relatively small, scrappy team, it's much more challenging because you take a step back and have to make some unfortunate and challenging determinations of, “Okay, am I going to A) sit here and have very expensive people build tooling, or B) have them work on features, which, you know, bring money into the company?” I'm not going to sit here and say that people are wrong for not investing in internal tooling early on. 

But at some point, the longer you go without making those investments, the greater your risk is because someone is going to get something wrong. They're going to fat-finger a command somewhere; they're going to run it on the wrong system; a key pair is going to not do what it needs to do; some error-checking was not built into whatever script you're having them run, and a command is going to fail, but it's going to continue on as if it succeeded and potentially run the wrong thing in the wrong place. It effectively is setting up a recipe for disaster, and when this happens, as it inevitably will, the natural response is going to be to blame the poor schmuck who had to go ahead and run your crappy shell script command because you couldn't bother to invest in internal tooling. This is an area that's near and dear to my heart because it's something that I spend a fair bit of time worrying about myself. Again, I've built a ridiculous architecture that powers my newsletters, and I have a separate aspect of that, that lets my ad sales folks wind up injecting sponsor stuff into the newsletter for me. 

Fun fact that isn't super well known, I don't see any of the sponsor stuff that goes out in my newsletter until after I've already written that week's issue because I don't want to wind up finding myself having to change what I say to avoid irritating a sponsor, you know, like someone with a sense of self-preservation or an appreciation for maintaining their income might do. So, it's sort of an editorial firewall for me. In order for that to make sense, though, there was no way in the world I was going to get away with having people who are managing the ad sales portion, SSH-ing into a box, and running this arcane script that talks to DynamoDB. And, “Oh, yeah, just run this script; it invokes a lambda function, and—hey, where are you going? Come back,” is how that story is going to play out. 

So, my initial approach was to look into what it would take to pay someone who's good at building web forms and front-end tooling. It turns out those people cost a lot of money. My approach was to ultimately use Retool, which I've talked about repeatedly on this show, but there are a lot of tools in this space. AWS Honeycode, for example, is one of the worst examples of something like this. The value there is that it ties together a bunch of APIs with a drag-and-drop Visual Basic style interface that lets you build internal web apps. 

And their pricing model is such that you would never in a million years use this for anything public. But for internal tooling, it's a great approach. Sure, you need some developer time to set up the APIs, or the scripts that it calls on the back end, but it's really an accelerated function here because you don't need anyone to spend time on UI, past drag and drop. When it comes time to update something, you can wind up changing an API parameter or building a quick API on the other side and the interface remains remarkably consistent for users. There are a number of tools like this out there, and I'm a big fan of the no-code/low-code movement, specifically because it solves incredible business issues here.

This episode is sponsored in part by our good friends over a ChaosSearch, which is a fully managed ...