Please login or sign up to post and edit reviews.
TAWF 164: Montreal Screwjob
Publisher |
Podbros Network
Media Type |
audio
Podknife tags |
Sports & Recreation
Wrestling
Categories Via RSS |
Arts
Comedy
Performing Arts
Sports
Wrestling
Publication Date |
Nov 12, 2017
Episode Duration |
00:38:01
Montreal Screwjob: 20 Years Later It’s been 20 years since the Montreal Screwjob.  For the unitiated, the Montreal Screwjob was a historic double cross that saw Vince McMahon force Earl Hebner to ring the bell when Shawn Michaels had Bret Hart in the Sharpshooter.   The moment has spurred many theories.  Some people think it’s a […]

Montreal Screwjob: 20 Years Later

It’s been 20 years since the Montreal Screwjob.  For the unitiated, the Montreal Screwjob was a historic double cross that saw Vince McMahon force Earl Hebner to ring the bell when Shawn Michaels had Bret Hart in the Sharpshooter.   The moment has spurred many theories.  Some people think it’s a work, others think it’s a shoot.  Here’s what some of the most notable figures in wrestling thing about that night in Montreal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cOI71NH8SY

Twitter Fingers

Another topic of discussion on this episode of TAWF is WWE’s insistence on using social media as a narrative device.  It’s a bizarre method of advancing angles and seems like lazy storytelling.  What are your thoughts on WWE using social media channels as a narrative platform?

Montreal Screwjob: 20 Years Later

It’s been 20 years since the Montreal Screwjob.  For the unitiated, the Montreal Screwjob was a historic double cross that saw Vince McMahon force Earl Hebner to ring the bell when Shawn Michaels had Bret Hart in the Sharpshooter.   The moment has spurred many theories.  Some people think it’s a work, others think it’s a shoot.  Here’s what some of the most notable figures in wrestling thing about that night in Montreal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cOI71NH8SY

Twitter Fingers

Another topic of discussion on this episode of TAWF is WWE’s insistence on using social media as a narrative device.  It’s a bizarre method of advancing angles and seems like lazy storytelling.  What are your thoughts on WWE using social media channels as a narrative platform?

This episode currently has no reviews.

Submit Review
This episode could use a review!

This episode could use a review! Have anything to say about it? Share your thoughts using the button below.

Submit Review