Speaking with: Emma Power and Jennifer Kent about why Australian cities and homes aren't built for pets
Podcast |
Speaking with...
Publisher |
The Conversation
Media Type |
audio
Categories Via RSS |
News & Politics
Publication Date |
Aug 29, 2017
Episode Duration |
00:22:28
20170808-11490-1nsi752.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=496&fit=clip">A canine commuter catches up on some sleep on the Paris Metro. Kevin O'Mara/Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND

We’re a nation of pet lovers: 60% of Australian households have some kind of pet. And with dogs in 39% of those homes, it’s only natural that we’re starting to see dogs sitting happily alongside human diners at places like cafes and pubs.

But while we have one of the highest levels of pet ownership in the world, our rights and infrastructure planning don’t seem to be built around this reality. No Australian cities allow dogs on public transport – something that’s commonplace in many cities in Europe – and many tenants find that looking for a rental property with a pet is virtually impossible.

Dallas Rogers speaks with Emma Power, urban cultural geography senior research fellow at Western Sydney University, and Jennifer Kent, urban planning research fellow at the University of Sydney, about why a nation of pet lovers doesn’t seem very interested in planning for pets.


Subscribe to The Conversation’s Speaking With podcasts on iTunes, or follow on Tunein Radio.

Additional audio:

Music:

The Conversation

Dallas Rogers has received funding from The Henry Halloran Trust, AHURI, Urban Growth, the Community Broadcasting Association of Australia, the University of Sydney and Western Sydney University.

Why does Australia, a nation of pet lovers, not allow pets on public transport or guarantee tenants the right to keep a pet?

This episode currently has no reviews.

Submit Review
This episode could use a review!

This episode could use a review! Have anything to say about it? Share your thoughts using the button below.

Submit Review