When Nanar came on the show a few weeks ago to discuss the background of the Syrian Civil War, we all learned a lot and the response was great! After messaging back and forth about the Sarin attack of April 4th though, it became clear that we disagreed on who the likely culprit was. So, Nanar agreed to come on and have a bit of a debate about it. In my opinion, this was about the best possible kind of debate - where we both genuinely care about the truth of the matter more than scoring any sort of debate points. Along those lines, I'll include all of my sources and the sources Nanar sent for your consideration below. I'm very curious to hear where people land on this question! Thomas's links: syria-strike-conspiracy-theories.html"> New York Times Breakdown, Guardian Piece First Reporter on Site - BEST SOURCE, How the Alt-Right Was Fed a Narrative by Russian Media, NYT on Assad Motives, Washington Post on US Gov Debunking Russia Story Nanar has written his evidence into research paper form. Check it out here: why-its-not-chemical-attack-by-gov.pdf"> Proof-why-its-not-chemical-attack-by-gov Direct Download