This episode currently has no reviews.
Submit ReviewThis week's episode covers King v Burwell, a case that saved Obamacare in America despite being almost completely incorrect from a strict statutory construction standpoint. King is also compared to the Texas Disparate Housing case and how both cases illustrate the difference between being persuasive and being correct. Brett and Nazim also share their thoughts on the outcome of the same sex marraige case, despite recording the day before it was decided.
This episode currently has no reviews.
Submit ReviewThis episode could use a review! Have anything to say about it? Share your thoughts using the button below.
Submit Review