Episode 119: Consistently Inconsistent
Podcast |
Oral Argument
Media Type |
audio
Categories Via RSS |
Education
Philosophy
Society & Culture
Publication Date |
Dec 09, 2016
Episode Duration |
01:00:17
In an alternate studio, with alternate equipment and chairs, striving to get back in the groove, blowing out the rust, we make our return to the interweb-waves. (Please forgive some of the audio dips and quiet portions.) No particular agenda, but we wind up responding to some long-ago feedback about the stagecraft of judicial proceedings. This show’s links: First Mondays (http://www.firstmondays.fm) Oral Argument 79: He Said It Peabody Well (http://oralargument.org/79) The Supreme Court of the UK (https://www.supremecourt.uk/index.html) Jay Wexler’s SCOTUS Humor (http://jaywex.com/wordpress/scotus-humor/) Oral Argument 31: Knee Defender (http://oralargument.org/31) Plato, The Republic (http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/republic.html) and, yep, r/plato (https://www.reddit.com/r/Plato/) Texas v. Johnson (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2084618710761560217)

In an alternate studio, with alternate equipment and chairs, striving to get back in the groove, blowing out the rust, we make our return to the interweb-waves. (Please forgive some of the audio dips and quiet portions.) No particular agenda, but we wind up responding to some long-ago feedback about the stagecraft of judicial proceedings.

This show’s links:

In an alternate studio, with alternate equipment and chairs, striving to get back in the groove, blowing out the rust, we make our return to the interweb-waves. (Please forgive some of the audio dips and quiet portions.) No particular agenda, but we wind up responding to some long-ago feedback about the stagecraft of judicial proceedings.

This show’s links:

This episode currently has no reviews.

Submit Review
This episode could use a review!

This episode could use a review! Have anything to say about it? Share your thoughts using the button below.

Submit Review