Banister v. Davis
Publisher |
Oyez
Media Type |
audio
Categories Via RSS |
Government & Organizations
National
Publication Date |
Dec 04, 2019
Episode Duration |
00:58:54
A case in which the Court held that a timely Rule 59(e) motion to “amend or alter” a habeas court’s judgment is not a second or successive habeas petition.

This episode currently has no reviews.

Submit Review
This episode could use a review!

This episode could use a review! Have anything to say about it? Share your thoughts using the button below.

Submit Review